{"id":62,"date":"2020-03-31T13:55:25","date_gmt":"2020-03-31T13:55:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/?p=62"},"modified":"2020-03-31T13:55:25","modified_gmt":"2020-03-31T13:55:25","slug":"reasoning-syllogism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/?p=62","title":{"rendered":"Reasoning Syllogism"},"content":{"rendered":"

Based on the given Statements, You are required to evaluate which conclusion follows.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mark 1. If the 1st statement follows
Mark 2. If the 2nd statement follows
Mark 3. If both follows
Mark 4. I f none follows<\/p>\n

Questions<\/strong><\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1 All Doctors are engineers Statement.2 All Engineers are Advocates
Conclusion 1. All Advocates are Doctors Conclusion 2. All Doctors are Advocates<\/p>\n

Answer is 2<\/strong>. Both are SAP type premises, hence, the conclusion may be SAP type. Incase of first conclusion the term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffAdvocate\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 which is distributed is not distributed in question.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1. Some Chairs are Furniture Statement.2. Some Furniture is Tables
Conclusion 1.Some Tables are Chairs Conclusion 2. Some furniture is chairs<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. Both Statements are SIP type or particular. Hence, No conclusion is possible.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1. All flowers are buds Statement.2. No bud is bush
Conclusion 1. No bush is flower Conclusion 2. All flowers is flower<\/p>\n

Answer is 1<\/strong>. First statement is SAP and second statement is SEP, ie, Universal negative, from which we will get only SEP.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1. No cat is elephant Statement.2. No elephant is animal
Conclusion 1. No cat is animal Conclusion 2. Some elephant is cat<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. Combination Universal negative premises will produce no conclusion<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1. All monkeys are animals Statement.2. Anil is an animal
Conclusion 1. Anil is a monkey Conclusion 2. All monkey are animals<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffanimal\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 has not been distributed at least once in the premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1. Some Apples are bricks Statement.2. All grapes are bricks
Conclusion 1. Some Apples are grapes Conclusion 2. Al bricks are grapes<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffbricks\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 has not been distributed at least once in the premises.<\/p>\n

Q Statement.1. All plants are trees Statement.2. No tree is stone
Conclusion 1. No stone is plants Conclusion 2. Some stones are plants<\/p>\n

Answer is 1<\/strong>. Combination of SAP (Universal positive) and SEP (universal negative) often produce SEP.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1.All players are tall Statement.2.Rahul is tall
Conclusion 1. Rahul is player Conclusion 2. No player is tall<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00fftall\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 is distributed at least once in the premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1.All students read news paper Statement.2. Rahul doesn\u0393\u00c7\u00d6t read newspaper
Conclusion 1. Rahul is a student. Conclusion 2. Rahul is not a student<\/p>\n

Answer is 2<\/strong>. Combination of SAP (Universal positive) and SEP (universal negative) often produce SEP.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1. All rivers are ponds Statement.2. Some ponds are lakes
Conclusion 1. Some lakes are not ponds Conclusion 2. All lakes are rivers<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffponds\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 has not been distributed at least once in the premises<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1All windows are doors Statement.2 No door is a bat
Conclusion 1. No window is bat `Conclusion 2. No bat is door<\/p>\n

Answer is 3<\/strong>. Combination of SAP and SEP produces SEP only.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1.All glasses are liquids Statement 2.All liquids are fluids
Conclusion 1. All glasses are fluids Conclusion 2. All fluids are glasses<\/p>\n

Answer is 1<\/strong>. In Second conclusion, the term \u0393\u00c7\u00fffluids\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 is distributed which is not distributed in premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. Some gold are bright. Statement 2. Some bright are silver
Conclusion 1. Some gold are silver Conclusion 2. Some bright are gold.<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffponds\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 has not been distributed at least once in the premises. More over, the combination of SIP and SIP never produces any conclusion.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1.All flowers are garden Statement. 2. All gardens are fruits.
Conclusion 1. All fruits are flowers Conclusion 2. All flowers are fruits.<\/p>\n

Answer is 2<\/strong>. In first conclusion, the term \u0393\u00c7\u00fffruits\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 is distributed which is not distributed in premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. All poets are singers Statement 2. No singer is composer.
Conclusion 1. No composer is poet Conclusion 2. All singers are poet.<\/p>\n

Answer is 1<\/strong>. In Second conclusion, the term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffsinger\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 is distributed which is not distributed in first premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. All Tables are cupboards Statement 2. Some cupboards are chairs
Conclusion 1. Some chairs are Tables Conclusion 2. No chair is Table<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffcupboard\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 has not been distributed at least once in the premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. No tigers are rabbits Statement 2. No rabbit is a jackal
Conclusion 1. All tigers are jackal Conclusion 2. Some tigers are jackal<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. More over, the combination of SEP and SEP produces nothing.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. Some blues are oranges Statement 2. Some oranges are green
Conclusion 1. Some blues are green Conclusion 2. No blue is green.<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00fforanges\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 has not been distributed at least once in the premises. More over, the combination of SIP and SIP never produces any conclusion.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. Some hotels are teashop. Statement 2.All restaurants are teashop
Conclusion 1. Some Hotels are restaurants. Conclusion 2. No Hotel is restaurant.<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. The middle term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffteashop\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 has not been distributed at least once in the premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. Some shops are footages Statement 2. All footages are slippers.
Conclusion 1. Some slippers are shops Conclusion 2. No slipper is shop<\/p>\n

Answer is 1<\/strong>. In Second conclusion, the term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffslipper\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 is distributed which is not distributed in premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1.No book is eraser Statement 2. Some erasers are not pens
Conclusion 1. Some books are pens Conclusion 2. Some erasers are pens.<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. More over, the combination of two negative premises produces nothing.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement.1.All MLAs are Ministers. Statement 2. No Minister is MP.
Conclusion 1. All MLAs are MPs. Conclusion 2. No MP is MLA<\/p>\n

Answer is 2<\/strong>. Combination of SAP and SEP produces SEP only.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1. Some Kings are queens Statement 2. All queens are bishops.
Conclusion 1. Some Kings are bishops Statement 2. All Kings are Bishops<\/p>\n

Answer is 1<\/strong>. In Second conclusion, the term \u0393\u00c7\u00ffkings\u0393\u00c7\u00d6 is distributed which is not distributed in premises.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1.No teacher is Engineer Statement 2. Some engineers are not Doctor
Conclusion 1. All teachers are Doctors Conclusion 2. Some teachers are Doctors.<\/p>\n

Answer is 4<\/strong>. More over, the combination of two negative premises produces nothing.<\/p>\n

Q<\/strong> Statement 1.All Politicians are Sociologist. Statement 2. All sociologists are fighters.
Conclusion 1. All politicians are fighters. Conclusion 2. Some fighters are Politicians.<\/p>\n

Answer is 3.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Based on the given Statements, You are required to evaluate which conclusion follows. Mark 1. If the 1st statement follows Mark 2. If the 2nd statement follows Mark 3. If both follows Mark 4. I f none follows Questions Q Statement.1 All Doctors are engineers Statement.2 All Engineers are Advocates Conclusion 1. All Advocates are…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ugc-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=62"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=62"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=62"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/temp.ashkerala.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=62"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}